calico corners promo code

Froma Harrop: Recalling the jihad against Martha Stewart

Check out the report card from Nebraska's 44-25 win against Wisconsin on Saturday at Memorial Stadium. Who can name Nebraska's last 100-yard rusher in a game, before Emmett Johnson achieved the feat Saturday? Johnson ran like he had something to prove, repeatedly shedding the first Badger to get to him. His best run of the day may have been a 19-yard burst in the third quarter when he patiently followed pulling linemen Ben Scott and Henry Lutovsky. Dante Dowdell has a knack for the end zone, scoring three times. (Trivia answer: Chubba Purdy ... against Wisconsin last year). Dylan Raiola has his rhythm back. He spent most of the game hovering around a 70 percent completion rate, which is reminiscent of his first four or five games. The ball is getting out of his hands quicker, and those pitch-and-catches are finally going for big gains. One of his best throws of the day was originally ruled a touchdown on a fade ball to Isaiah Neyor, but replay confirmed he didn't get a foot down. Jahmal Banks had a great TD snag in which he leaped, snared the ball and got his toes down. John Bullock's second tackle for loss of the game stopped Wisconsin's Tawee Walker on fourth-and-1 midway through the third quarter, and it felt like an early dagger for the home team. Bullock was a standout on senior day. The Huskers had some open-field tackling issues but held their own on third- and fourth-down situations. Darrion Dupree was a nice change-of-pace option for the Badgers, averaging 7.5 yards on his seven attempts. Wisconsin found success early on slant passes, including one that went to Vinny Anthony for 42 yards after Isaac Gifford whiffed on a tackle. After that, Braedyn Locke was able to open it for deep balls, including touchdown tosses of 24 and 58 yards. Wisconsin's Vinny Anthony had a big day, racking up six catches for 128 yards and Locke threw for more yards than he has in his past five games. A cool moment for DeShon Singleton, who came down with an interception in his final game at Memorial Stadium. Brian Buschini is having a great season, and Saturday was another notch on his belt. First, he ripped a 52-yard punt that flipped field possession, and he followed that up with a 49-yard boot that went out of bounds at the Wisconsin 3-yard line. Equally as impressive was kicker John "ol' reliable" Hohl, who made all three of his field goals and stayed clean on extra points. Oh, and how about Jacory Barney's 55-yard kick return to open the game? NU's third phase is trending up after a turbulent stretch. A question we might not ever get an answer to: Why was Matt Rhule forced to use a challenge to review Wisconsin's first-quarter touchdown? Don't all scoring plays get reviewed automatically? In a similar situation later in the game, Wisconsin was spared from using a challenge for officials to take another look at a Nebraska touchdown, which was reversed. Also, the unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Micah Mazzccua for spiking the ball on a touchdown felt unnecessary. Nebraska scored a touchdown on its first possession of a game for the first time since the Northern Iowa game. A true tone-setter. There's plenty to unpack from Holgorsen's play sheet — it's no coincidence it only took him two games to pop a 100-yard rusher. And, 44 points for a team that has scored 20 (twice), 17, 7 and 14 in its past five games. That'll do. For the first time in 49 days, Nebraska won a football game. That was a long 49 for everyone involved. This one is a little more cathartic than usual, too, as the Huskers finally wrapped their arms around a bowl berth. It also takes a big bite out of the pressure NU faces on Black Friday vs. Iowa, which is no longer a "must-win." Get local news delivered to your inbox!Laurie Baratti | (TNS) TravelPulse As the holidays approach, travelers hoping for smooth journeys will want to know at which U.S. airports the weather most often wreaks havoc. A recent analysis by Upgraded Points, using data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, revealed which airports are most likely to experience weather-related delays from November through January. Related Articles The right book can inspire the young readers in your life, from picture books to YA novels Holiday gift ideas for the movie lover, from bios and books to a status tote These holiday gifts change the game when building fires, printing photos, watching birds and more Beer pairings for your holiday feasts Best (and worst) Black Friday deals of 2024 The analysis identifies five major U.S. airports that regularly see high numbers of weather-related delays during the holiday months. These airports, which include both coastal and northern hubs, are vulnerable to various weather disruptions, from heavy rains and fog to snow and icy conditions. Travelers flying through these locations should be prepared for longer waits and potential rescheduling. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) tops the list, with a striking 42.3% of holiday delays caused by weather. December is particularly challenging at SFO, where over half of all delays in that month (50.5%) are weather-related, often due to rain and fog. Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) follows closely, with 42.1% weather-related delays, driven by the frequent winter storms that hit the East Coast. LaGuardia Airport (LGA), an East Coast hub, ranks third with 38.3% of delays attributed to inclement weather, reflecting the challenges of winter travel in the Northeast. In Seattle, November rain and fog are common, contributing to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport’s (SEA) 38.1% weather-delay rate. Rounding out the top five, Boston’s Logan International Airport (BOS) has a 31.3% weather-delay rate, which spikes during the city’s harsh winter season. For travelers looking to avoid weather-related delays, several U.S. airports typically experience fewer disruptions during the holiday months. Warm coastal climates and reliably milder weather conditions help keep these airports running smoothly. With a low weather-related delay rate of 11%, Honolulu’s Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL) is the most reliable option for those aiming for hassle-free holiday travel. Thanks to Hawaii’s tropical climate, flights here face few weather disruptions even during peak travel periods. Houston’s William P. Hobby Airport (HOU) and Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) are close behind, each with around 12% of delays attributed to weather. Meanwhile, Dallas Love Field (DAL), San Diego International Airport (SAN) and Miami International Airport (MIA) all see weather-related delays at rates under 13.5%, making them solid options for travelers seeking smoother travel experiences. 1. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) – 42.3% of delays due to weather 2. Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) – 42.1% 3. LaGuardia Airport (LGA) – 38.3% 4. Seattle–Tacoma International Airport (SEA) – 38.1% 5. Logan International Airport (BOS) – 31.3% 1. Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL) – 11% 2. William P. Hobby Airport (HOU) – 12.3% 3. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) – 12.4% 4. Dallas Love Field (DAL) – 12.7% 5. San Diego International Airport (SAN), Miami International Airport (MIA) – 13.1% (tied) ©2024 Northstar Travel Media, LLC. Visit at travelpulse.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Jaishankar Inaugurates Indian Embassy's New Chancery In Italy, Lauds Historical Ties Between Two NationsPHOENIX — The head of the Arizona Office of Tourism resigned abruptly Friday amid questions of a conflict of interest in a $700,000 expenditure for a new logo. Lisa Urias submitted her resignation to Gov. Katie Hobbs less than 24 hours after House Majority Whip Teresa Martinez said she wants an investigation. The Casa Grande Republican said there are legal questions about the decision by Urias’ office to spend money with Urias Communications for a rebranding effort. Urias has said that while she still owns the company she has cut financial ties. She later told the Arizona Republic, however, she continues to get a “stipend’’ from the firm but would not disclose the amount. Whatever the financial arrangement, the governor said it was clear that Urias had to go. “Anyone who has the privilege of serving the public needs to be above reproach,’’ Hobbs said Friday. “That’s why I accepted her resignation this morning,’’ the governor continued. “This appearance of a conflict is not acceptable.’’ Hobbs sidestepped questions about whether it made sense for the state to spend $700,000 on what critics say was simply designing a new logo. “This is not about that project,’’ she said. “This is about the appearance of conflict that is unacceptable.’’ But what also is true is that Urias’ future at the agency likely was limited. In a social media post Thursday, Senate President Warren Petersen said the odds of Urias getting confirmed by the Senate “are zero.” Urias “She should resign or be removed by the governor immediately,” the Gilbert Republican said. Urias acknowledged that reality. “I was caught in a maelstrom of unfounded and false allegations regarding the financial management of this project,” she wrote in her resignation letter. And Urias said neither the firm that bears her name nor she personally has ever benefited from this project or any work related to the Arizona Office of Tourism. But that, she said, doesn’t make the issue go away. “It became evidence that these false allegations would obstruct by confirmation by the Senate confirmation committee,’’ Urias wrote. Hobbs, in accepting her resignation, said Friday she had not heard about the call by Martinez for an investigation. But Martinez said the resignation does not end her call for Attorney General Kris Mayes and Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell to look into the issue. All this relates to reports by Arizona Agenda that Urias suggested to Heart & Soul Marketing, a third-party design firm, that it hire artist Kevin Coochwytewa to develop the new logo. He was eventually hired by that firm, earning a reported $27,500. But the report also said that Coochwytewa is the brother of Jason Coochwytewa, who took over for Urias as the CEO of Urias Communications. “The issue, originally, in my mind, was the conflict,’’ Martinez said, saying even if her company was not benefiting “the optics look bad.’’ She said, though, even with Urias on her way out the door from her $205,000 job — her resignation is effective Dec. 4 — there are other questions that need to be answered. And central to all that, Urias said, was the price tag for the new logo and why the state needed to hire an outside firm to design it. “People make fun of why a hammer costs $1,500 if the government buys it versus the 15 bucks at Ace Hardware,” she said. “This is government bloat,” Martinez continued. “This is waste and fraud and abuse. This is not a good thing.’’ But Josh Coddington, the public information officer at the tourism office, said all that is based on misinformation. Yes, he said, there is the logo. But Coddington said this was just a piece of the whole effort to rebrand the state. It included a year-long “discovering Arizona listening tour,’’ described by the agency as asking 1,000 Arizonans about things like what they love about where they live and what would they show a visitor. All that led to a new Vibrant Arizona brand identity including six “pillars’’ including majestic beauty; vibrant arts, culture and experiences,; abundant diversity; welcoming warmth; strong connections; and trailblazing ingenuity. Coddington said the contract also included a video highlighting the pillars and revealing the new identity. “We didn’t do it in house because we don’t have graphic designers on staff and because the ambitious scope of work was beyond what Arizona Office of Tourism could handle,’’ he said. Hobbs herself boasted of the work when she announced the Vibrant Arizona brand and log in August. “Arizona deserves a brand as vibrant as its people, one that showcases our collective Arizona story,’’ the governor said. Howard Fischer is a veteran journalist who has been reporting since 1970 and covering state politics and the Legislature since 1982. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter, Bluesky , and Threads at @azcapmedia or email azcapmedia@gmail.com . Respond: Write a letter to the editor | Write a guest opinion Subscribe to stay connected to Tucson. A subscription helps you access more of the local stories that keep you connected to the community. Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox! Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.

While the global population continues to soar, some countries saw immense population declines this year. According to data from the United Nations, Pacific island nations dominated the countries with the largest losses in 2024, followed by locations in Eastern Europe. High emigration, low immigration, and low birth rates were common contributing factors. Click through to see which nations shrunk the most in 2024.  Estonia in Eastern Europe is the tenth fastest shrinking nation in the world in 2024, with a 0.98 per cent population decrease . It's one of many in the region facing population decline, mostly due to political instability, low quality of life, and low immigration and birth rates. According to UN predictions, 9 of the top 10 nations expected to shrink the most by 2050 are in Eastern Europe, including Bulgaria in first place (22.5 per cent decrease). The Czech Republic - most famous for its charming capital, Prague - is a surprising addition this list, with a 1.04 per cent population decline this year. This small decrease follows a population spike between 2021 and 2023, as well as a gradually increasing population since 2001, however the UN predicts this trend will continue next year due to low immigration and fertility.  Moldova is the European nation with the fastest declining population, shrinking by 1.22 per cent this year. Since 1990, its population has declined by a third - from 4.5 million to just over 3 million - due to political instability, low quality of life, high mortality rates, and high emigration levels. Landlocked between Romania and Ukraine, it is the second poorest country in Europe based on GDP after Ukraine.  American Samoa's population shrunk by 1.61 per cent in 2024, bringing it in seventh. The U.S. territory has an estimated population of around 46,400 at the end of 2024, roughly 1000 less than last year's count. One of a slew of Pacific nations on this list, many are leaving the country to escape poverty and seek opportunities abroad. The Pacific island nation of Tuvalu saw a 1.69 per cent population decrease in 2024, making it sixth on this list. A member of the British commonwealth, Tuvalu comprises 9, sparsely-populated islands that are some of the fastest sinking due to climate change. With this existential threat, its little wonder people are emigrating from the island. The Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. commonwealth in the North Pacific, is the fifth fastest shrinking nation in 2024, with a 1.76 per cent population decline. It's estimated just under 44,000 people live in the Islands, a number that's been in sharp decline since the year 2000. Like other Pacific Island nations on this list, low immigration and high emigration levels, as well as persistently low fertility, are to blame.  Despite being a tourist hotspot that many dream of living in, Greece experienced the fourth largest population decline ( 1.77 per cent ) in 2024. Current projections suggest its population could fall to around 8 million by 2050 from just over 10 million in 2024.  Among other factors, the Greek economic crisis of the 2010s is largely to blame, leading to a dramatic reduction in fertility rates and heightened emigration that has driven down the population. The Marshall Islands - a chain of land masses and atolls in the middle of the Pacific - are yet another island nation near the top of this list, with a 3.38 per cent population decrease in 2024. The population fell from around 27,500 at the end of 2023 to 26,100 at the end of 2024. Emigration is largely responsible for this shrinkage, with many leaving for greater opportunities in urban areas, and due to climate change threats. The Cook Islands come in second for the nation with the fastest declining population in 2024, recording a 3.46 per cent population decrease. A cluster of factors including low immigration and high emigration and low fertility are likely responsible for this Pacific nation's shrinkage. The population has been falling since the late 2010s, with further decline expected in the next twenty-five years.  It's estimated population at the end of 2024 is over 13,500, according to United Nations estimates.  The Caribbean island of Saint Martin had the fastest shrinking population in 2024, with a decline of almost 5 per cent. With a net increase of 1 person every 360 minutes according to estimates, it's hard to believe this tropical paradise was the least desired place to live on earth this year. Its population has been declining since 2015, and will likely continue to fall as people move to urban areas abroad.The Australian government has withdrawn a bill that would have fined online platforms up to 5 percent of their global revenue if they failed to stop the spread of misinformation. The bill, which was backed by the Labor government, would have allowed the Australian Communications and Media Authority to create enforceable rules around misinformation on digital platforms. In a statement , Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said the bill would have “ushered in an unprecedented level of transparency, holding big tech to account for their systems and processes to prevent and minimise the spread of harmful misinformation and disinformation online.” However, she said “based on public statements and engagements with Senators, it is clear that there is no pathway to legislate this proposal through the Senate.” When a revised version of the bill was introduced in September, Elon Musk, the owner of X (formerly Twitter), criticized it in a one-word post : “Fascists.” Shadow Communications Minister David Coleman was a vocal opponent of the bill, arguing that it would prompt platforms to suppress free speech in order to avoid fines. With the bill now seemingly dead, Coleman posted that it was a “shocking attack on free speech that betrayed our democracy” and called on the prime minister to “rule out any future version of this legislation.” Rowland’s statement, meanwhile, called for Parliament support on “other proposals to strengthen democratic institutions and keep Australians safe online,” including legislation targeting deep fakes, enforcement of “truth in political advertising for elections,” and AI regulation. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is also pursuing a plan to ban social media for children under 16 .

Minor league pitchers Luis Moreno, Alejandro Crisostomo suspended after positive drug tests

UNLV beats UC Riverside 66-53

Syria's Druze hope for better future without Assad6A All-Idaho boys soccer team: The state’s best talent from its toughest division

Russia has a stock of powerful new missiles “ready to be used”, President Vladimir Putin has said, a day after his country fired a new ballistic missile at the Ukrainian city of Dnipro. In an unscheduled TV address, the Russian leader said the Oreshnik missile could not be intercepted and promised to carry out more tests, including in “combat conditions”. Russia’s use of the Oreshnik capped a week of escalation in the war that also saw Ukraine fire US and British missiles into Russia for the first time. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called for world leaders to give a “serious response” so that Putin “feels the real consequences of his actions”. His country was asking Western partners for updated air defence systems, he added. According to news agency Interfax-Ukraine, Kyiv is seeking to obtain the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), or to upgrade its Patriot anti-ballistic missile defence systems. In Friday’s address Putin said the Oreshnik hypersonic missiles flew at 10 times the speed of sound and ordered them to be put into production. He had earlier said that use of the missile was a response to Ukraine’s use of Storm Shadow and Atacms missiles. Thursday’s strike on Dnipro was described as unusual by eyewitnesses and triggered explosions which went on for three hours. The attack included a strike by a missile so powerful that in the aftermath Ukrainian officials said it resembled an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). Justin Crump, CEO and founder of the risk advisory company Sibylline, told the BBC that Moscow likely used the strike as a warning, noting that the missile – which is faster and more advanced that others in its arsenal – has the capacity to seriously challenge Ukraine’s air defences. This week’s escalation has also prompted several warnings from other world leaders about the direction of the war between Russia and Ukraine. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said the war was entering a decisive stage – with a real risk of global conflict. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban meanwhile said the West should take Vladimir Putin’s warnings “at face value” because Russia “bases its policies primarily on military power”. – BBC

Bison football adds Omaha three-star defensive end prospect Alijah WaynePlano police make arrest in 30-year-old kidnapping and sexual assault cold case